Exams & Assessment

AI Question Generation

An empty cell in the exam blueprint gets filled with original items written for that outcome, and those items go into the institution's own pool. When the mock-exam calendar tightens, the problem facing an assessment…

indivitech.com / services / ai-question-generation
AI Question Generation

An empty cell in the exam blueprint gets filled with original items written for that outcome, and those items go into the institution's own pool. When the mock-exam calendar tightens, the problem facing an assessment team is not finding questions but finding the right one: bought-in sets tend to be items students have already met, or items that sit near an outcome rather than on it. A skills-based curriculum makes that gap harder to hide.

Each item arrives with its difficulty and cognitive level, its distractors built from the mistakes students actually make on that topic, and its answer and worked solution written alongside it. Nothing joins the pool without a similarity check against what is already there and a sign-off from the department, and multiple-choice and open-ended items follow the same route. That removes the need to buy in question sets or quietly recycle last year's mock papers. The pool grows against your own students' data as the term goes on, and writing an exam stops being a job that takes days.

Features
  • Multiple-choice and open-ended items written from an outcome
  • Difficulty and cognitive level set for each new item
  • Distractors built from common student misconceptions
  • Answer and worked solution written with every item
  • Similarity and duplicate checks against the existing pool
  • Items join the pool once a teacher approves them
Contact us

Let's bring your project to life.

Tell us your needs and we'll map out a plan tailored to you.

Related services

Question Bank Software
Exams & Assessment

Question Bank Software

Every question an institution owns sits in one outcome-tagged pool, so building an exam starts with a filter rather than a search through old folders. In most schools questions live on individual teachers' laptops, in old files and in photocopy binders, so the same item gets set twice by accident and nobody can say which outcomes have actually been assessed. The software turns that scattered archive into shared ground for the assessment team, department heads and content editors. A question is written once and stored with its grade, topic and outcome, so it can be pulled again for the next written exam, mock test or catch-up session. Teachers assemble a paper on screen, generate shuffled A and B variants of it, and send the booklet to print the same day. When results come back by outcome code, the follow-up test for the weak areas is drawn from the same pool. The hours lost to copying and pasting between files disappear, and the archive becomes institutional memory that survives staff changes.

View details
Personalized Book Software
Exams & Assessment

Personalized Book Software

Each student works from a question bank of their own, compiled from their own mock-exam and homework results and printed with their name on the cover. One book for the whole class means one student re-solving what they already know while another never gets enough practice where it costs them marks. Teachers can read those gaps off the mock-exam analysis, but nobody has the hours to build a worksheet per student, which is why the job sits with the assessment team and the subject heads. Production starts from data the institution already collects: as results read from answer sheets and homework records accumulate, the selection sharpens, questions the student has already got right are left out, and the spread of difficulty is set to their level. Each print run is rebuilt from the latest results, so the book changes with the student over the term. You hand over a class list, get print-ready files in one batch, and the books go out class by class. Photocopied extra sheets and hand-kept topic trackers drop out of the routine, and a parent meeting can start from something concrete the institution produced for that child.

View details
AI-Powered Assessment
Exams & Assessment

AI-Powered Assessment

Scoring the papers is not where the work ends: item difficulty, discrimination and distractor analysis measure the exam itself, not only the students. In most institutions the process closes when the sheets are scanned and the report cards go home, leaving the question of whether an item measured anything, or just confused everyone, to staffroom opinion. This is written for the people who set the paper and then have to explain the result to a parent: the assessment office, department heads and academic coordinators. It fits inside the exam calendar you already run — your department still writes the paper, the sheets are still scanned, and the difference begins once reading is done. A department meeting then opens with a list of items to retire and outcomes to teach again, instead of an argument about which questions felt hard. The same data tracks progress by outcome through the term, puts a predicted LGS or YKS score and percentile band beside a student's mock results, and gives the guidance team a table to open in a parent meeting. Next term's exam plan is then built from those tables rather than from memory.

View details